===== From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk: Nice concept. The image would benefit from a layer of ground fog. An icebound space port perhaps? ===== From darwallace@earthlink.net: The mountain heightfield lacks detail. ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: It looks slightly blurred. Did you use focal blur, or is it smoothed some other way? ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Had difficulty making out what it was. ===== From douge@nls.net: It looks like the image is out of focus. ===== From tony@j4tb.com: It looks like a futuristic doc with a Mantari attacking it. A little better sense of scale would be nice. ===== From frepe@ifm.liu.se: You should have tried 600x428 instead. Now it looks too blurry. I can't see what's in the picture. ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: I think, that is really stretching the subject. It does not catch me anyway. Though there certainly is some work here. Again, watch the horizon and the clouds low on it. ===== From jrcsurvey@aol.com: Visually rich, provocative, though I am not sure what it adds up to. ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: Good use of lighting to create a moody, nighttime scene. The water has an odd look to it, though, and the scene could maybe use a bit of fog to blur out the sharpness of the horizon. ===== From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk: Some good moddeling here, it's a shame you couldn't do some more test renders, because I thin the lighting could have been tweaked ;-\ The image has a certain beauty of its own enhanced somewhat by you unashamedly putting a space ship in the image. By using the -C command line option pov will pick up where it left off from rendering an image, particularly useful in situations like yours where you have a crach while doing a long render. ===== From delfeld@mailcity.com: If I am left to interpret the scene, I cannot figure it out. There doesn't seem to be any coherence to the image or to the idea. ===== From file: I find this a confusing image. I'm not quite sure of the scale of everything in it, or the nature of the major elements.