===== From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk: the fishtank's good, everything else looks a little flat. well modelled though. ===== From pbourke@swin.edu.au: Seems like a bit of an adaptation for the current topic. The fish are a bit big for the tank. Quite nice diffuse lighting around the tank. ===== From dvnss@mega.ist.utl.pt: Nice... weird fishes, though! ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Image has a nice feel to it but the fish tank needed more realism. ===== From tony@j4tb.com: Good description on image. Overall I like the image but it is a streach on the topic. ===== From whitey@telefragged.com: I like the lighting, the top surface of the water should have some sort of bump map though, because the bubble jets kinda swirl the water around. That one big fish is kinda out of scale, don't you think? ===== From bbowen@cswnet.com: I noticed the peeling image right away. I thought it was a nice touch of realism. I've hardly ever seen a tank background stay where it was supposed to. :) ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: Nice idea and realisation. Nice lighting of the scene, I like the atmosphere. Maybe the tank could do with some more weeds and stuff. ===== From mischa@binary-designs.org: That's a very pretty indoor scene! ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: Nice work here... the lighting is interesting, and the shaping on the stairposts is nice. The shaping on the fish could maybe use a little work, but other than that, good job. ===== From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk: The image looks a bit flat for some reason, and the fish don't seem to have any transparancy at all. More contrast between the colours of the stairs and the paint work might have been good. ===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: A very nice fishtank, but why is it over on the edge of the image? A slightly more central placing woulod make a better composition, because the walls are very bare. Alternatively, some more detail on the room itself would help. It's all nice - just compositionally unbalanced. ===== From delfeld@mailcity.com: Conservative image. The part I enjoyed most was the little something you added. I was wondering why the background image seemed a little off, and it piqued my curiosity. Nice visual movement in the picture, despite the static theme.