=====
From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk:
very nice water, not that realistic but that deosn't matter. the rocks hurt the
image i think...

=====
From panthus@xtra.co.nz:
Wonderfully abstract and artful. A real sense of something intangible about the
sea. Excellent work.



=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Nice water but I am not sure what the swirl represents.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Not for me.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The wave object looks interesting, and the rocks are not 
bad.  Not sure about the mint-green sky, though.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
The water looks good, but the rock texture doesn't look wet enough, and the
sky is terquoise.  If the camera was there and that was a real wave, the
camara position would be covered by such a wave, the wave wouldn't have a hard
boundry like that.  

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
The dark rock doesn't take away from the wave. . . it helps, actually.  Doesn't
look a lot like a wave, but it is a good composition.  The eye is kept in the
scene well, and there is a lot going on in the image -  every part seems to
help build the way one sees the picture.  I would have liked to see a larger
version, though the detail may overwhelm it at a larger size.


=====
From file:
The big wave has a very interesting glassy look. I could almost imagine this as
a sculpture.