===== From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk: like the water and the little creature's kinda cute ===== From elvish_archer@mailcity.com: a funny picture u can add pokemon too ===== From darwallace@earthlink.net: The sea monster needs serious texture work. A crackle-based texture for scales would have helped. ===== From pbourke@swin.edu.au: Sea monster - I think not. Cute, colourful maybe not not attractive. ===== From panthus@xtra.co.nz: Clear and bright, except for the dino-monster's gritty texture. I like the light blue, circle emanation through the water from the dino-monster, it focuses the picture. ===== From dvnss@mega.ist.utl.pt: Some very deranged monsters ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Nice idea but need to work on realism. ===== From douge@nls.net: The sea monster looks more cuddly than deadly! Very colorful. Water could use some work, though. ===== From tony@j4tb.com: A better desription would be nice. There is no sense of scale. Your sea monster seems a little rough. I like your island(?) and your water is pretty decent. ===== From whhale@nvl.army.mil: How long did this take after making all of those patches ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: That's stretching it a bit on the topic side. ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: The crab and plant objects look good. ===== From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk: The textures need quite a bit of work. ===== From went@netcourrier.com: The textures could have been improved. ===== From delfeld@mailcity.com: The textures are lousy on the mother, but _visually_, it works. I don't like cicular compositions because they are too static and non-directional, but the way the plants, reflections and creatures break up the waves brings it together. Is the baby monster walking on water? Actually, in physical reality, nothing works that way. . . but I don't really care either! I really like this picture. ===== From file: Monster - I think not. Mishapen lizard maybe.