=====
From :
That blue stone wall won't fly.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
The brick wall texture seems out of scale.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This does seem to lack a certain depth which would 
help the scene a lot.  Good work on the robe, though... 
it looks good.  The trees look rather odd, but that may 
be due to the lack of shadowing.

=====
From mwsny001@mweb.co.za:
The robe is very good!

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
Shame you didn't get the full render finished. The 
demoness is interesting, but I have my doubts about 
many of the other elements.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Sad you could not finish the final render in time, the character looks
well done, the tree technique looks very interesting too.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
I do like your figure and her invitation to the hidden
pathway. The scene itself could use something else
but I'm at a loss as to what. Maybe a tiki torch stuck
next to the figure combined with the path to the side
being slightly less illuminated, or something of the sort.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical:Good job on the acolyte, but the horns don't seem to fit the rest of
the body. Perhaps they should have been a bit smaller at the point where they
emerge from the skull.
Concept: Does one worship an acolyte?

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
This would be true if it would not but ignore the truth.  I would obey if I did
not but recognize that the nether region t'were not simply an assumed
possibility and truly no certainty.  

Axiology:
Wanting and obtaining sexuality in no way indicate anything BUT the 'straight
and narrow', heterosexually.  Maybe next time a seductive dog or chicken?  Or
what if admonishing sexuality were evil?

Ontology:
I would have to be a cow in the rut to live like her, and even then I would wear
warmer clothes.