=====
From :
The object is very nice, but, as you mentionned, it needs texture detail.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
A fair amount of fine work seems to have gone into this. I think maybe the fog
is just a little too much, especially with the focal blur included.

=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
Not bad for a first entry. Though not technically awsome it conveys a certain
mood.
=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Nice, but dark and poorly detailed.

=====
From twinfire_98@yahoo.com:
Some more textures for the building walls would have done a lot for this image.
But I like the model itself very much.
=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Definitely some nice work here, and a nice if somewhat 
simple scene overall.  The tile roof and the trees look 
particularly good.  More complex textures on the ground 
and the cathedral walls would really help the scene take 
on a new dimension.  Good use of simple shapes to 
create a complex structure, and the scene is nicely 
composed.  Looking forward to seeing more work from 
the artist.

=====
From ojamies@cs.helsinki.fi:
Wery good modelling. More complex textures would make huge impact on this one.

What is that diagonal "spike" comming from right side?
=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
The cathedral looks well done, i also like the surrounding.  The lighting
and atmosphere looks a bit strange, somehow like fog in the evening with
a dim sun behind.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
Good layout,  The fog seems a little oppressive, but not
out of place. The cathedral looks a bit ominous rather than
welcoming but that may be a function of the real thing, which
I have not looked at. 

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: Very nice composition
Technical: Nicely done, but I don't envy your problems with the exporting
time...
Concept:Fits the topic as a place of worship.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
What we know is more than what we see.

Axiology:
What is worshipped in this image?  

Ontology:
Careful work results in excellent work.  Sounds like a fortune in a cookie,
doesn't it?