=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Same angel. Less dark, though, and more reasoning.

=====
From houston_roadrunner@yahoo.com:
Now I see the angel! This is much better than the first and the image tells a
story, but the scene seems empty..unbalenced.

=====
From :

I prefer this one over your last one.  Nice theme.  Though there is aliasing on
the chalk drawing on the ground.  Also you may not want to make such large
renders for a scene like this.  Most IRTC users perfer a somewhat smaller
image, and there is lots of space in yours that does not need to be there. 
Besides, you lose a lot of quality when you compress huge images.
  One more tip, try and stick to 1 image when they are very similar, most voters
don't like voting twice on scenes by the same entrant when they are too
similar.
  
=====
From awilcox@dreampeach.com:
Too close to the previous one.
=====
From whitey@telefragged.com:
booooo

=====
From beighton155@yahoo.com:
Very morbid!

=====
From novotek@web.de:
nice story (if we have seen the "glassy-angel" before.

=====
From ruy@hipernet.com.br:
"Despair", "Regret" and "Depression" are not "Loneliness".

=====
From dapigg2000@yahoo.com:
The glass angel was better.
=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
I definitely prefer the idea of this version.
However the fog and all-brown colours make this image a bit flat.
=====
From tim.nikias@gmx.de:
Interesting idea, very simple but nicely sold.

=====
From rclee@oklahoma.net:
I liked angel_s better.  The fog is too thick.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
This image is much much better than the glass-material image.  Very =
powerful feelings here.
I think the fog is too thick.  The chalk lines on the road form a =
strange (too thin) outline of the body.  And its head is cut off.  The =
main figure is good, but the wings are ugly.  Where did the stone cube =
come from?

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
Ah yes, there's thank angel again...

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The detail on the angel is fairly good, although it is 
missing any facial features.  I find it awkward how the 
chalk outline abruptly ends... it appears as if there is 
some kind of object covering it, but I'd rather see the 
complete outline.

=====
From patrick@sypa.net:
2 scenes with the same angel ... 

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice modelling on the figure.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
The gratuitous nonhuman weakens the concept.