===== From rgow@lanset.com: KEWL! Like the planet and the buildings! Don't like the gray background, I think it detracts from the wonderful detail in the buildings. Excellent image though, with a serious interpretation of the topic. One of my favorites. ===== From chris@ugan.com: Technical a very good piece but the background is lacking. ===== From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com: Not on topic, but very impressive. ===== From awesomeamazingaaron@yahoo.com: This is UNBELIEVABLE!!! And all with a blinking cursor! I worship you! ===== From llama009@hotmail.com: Makes you think what wll happen to the world ===== From juanjcampos32@hotmail.com: I loved the concept and the monochromatic scheme gave it that metropolis sense of anonymity and isolation. I wanted to score it higher, but I could not ignore the inconsistent backdrop. ===== From ruy@hipernet.com.br: A spectacularly creative image indeed. I love the concept. A (single) rant: the buildings repeat a bit too much, I believe. ===== From mbasca@go.ro: The background is not appropriate. ===== From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com: Very nice concept! I love this one. Though the background design could do with some improvements. I would also like to see this one textured someday. ===== From batronyx@alliancecable.net: Truly a marvel of modelling. I'm glad the background is just the way you like, but it is my least favorite part. Still, I would take a poster of this any day. Great job! ===== From emperorofrome@yahoo.com: wow greatly original concept ===== From charliemc@prodigy.net: very very original and well done. ===== From 25ct@lineone.net: I think you have accomplished what you set out to do. Nice idea. ===== From jschmi@optonline.net: The best thing about doing this is framing the pictures and hanging them in one's home. I am going to do the same with mine! ===== From brendthess@attbi.com: A very striking concept and image! Well done! ===== From jrcsurvey@aol.com: Your picture seems to suggest that the picturing of landscape as something awesome or sublime is entombed in the past; that the modern urban world precludes any such romantic appreciation of a scene. The choice of art deco style is intended, perhaps, to be ironic, as a kind of over-optimistic framework for the modern age? ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Technically very interesting, i would probably have used stronger colors, different for the continents and the buildings for example. Maybe a blurred background would also have been a good idea. ===== From clem@dhol.org: Very striking. Stretches the term "landscape". Architecturally very implausible. Why fill the ocean beds with megaskyscrapers? What do you do about the plate boundaries? Where did the water go? Interesting nonetheless. ===== From ive@lilysoft.com: Very impressive interpretation of the theme. Like it. -Ive ===== From jimbobjim@blueyonder.co.uk: I don't think this image is as off-topic as you may think. It is a lanscape and it is *spectacular*. There is lots of detail to simply stare at - I would love to see this at a poster size. ===== From p_chan@shaw.ca: The monochromatic colour scheme works very well for this image. There are some strange patterns of light and dark in the center of the image (looking staight into the "planet"), which may just be the an effect of the lighting. Excellent work creating and placing the towers and continents in this scene. ===== From glenn@mccarters.net: Well, you certainly accomplished "worthwhile results". A positively = unique image. Fascinating detail. Good work. ===== From r@iprism.chandler.k12.az.us: You did a good job in making the buildings point straight out from the center. I do see some repitition in the buildings, I.E. the round ones seem to have alot of the same composition, and their are two twins almost right by each other. Other than that they are great Notable for originality, modelling, composition ===== From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net: Great modeling but the background doesn't seem finished to me or it was just an after-thought Notable for modelling