=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
The refection on the water still seems too broken or something. Doesn't look
reflective.

=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
You were brave to choose a silhouette. A scene like this relies a lot more on
shape and lighting because less detail is visible. Some work on the skyline
could improve this picture.





=====
From chris@ugan.com:
It's really too bad that you back-lite this image, I would have liked to have
seen it..

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
I can see you did use anti aliasing, and yet the reflections on the water seem
too spotty somehow, and stand out too much as they are more saturated in color
than the sky they reflect. 

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
very well done. i love that sky line

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Good concept but the difficulties of a view against the light are not that
well solved.  The lack of antialiasing is quite disadvantageous.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Very pretty.  The water is great.  I wish the mountains 
showed a bit more than silhouette.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The mountains work well as silhouttes in this image.  
The water could use more work, as I get the impression 
more of random turbulence than of waves in the 
foreground.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
Very dark unusual sea surface.  Interesting lighting effects.


=====
From file:
I, too, was going to do Guilin. Thank god I changed my mind. However, I don't
remember seeing palm trees last time I was there.
Notable for lighting


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
The lighting needs work on this one