=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Very pretty, but lacks a clearly defined focal point.



=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
The image has a lot of beautiful elements. I would recommend trying for a more
interesting shape and camera angle.



=====
From jguthkelch@netscape.net:
Nice image, but since it seems to have very little actual (brain) work in it, it
loses points for technical merit. Sorry

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
This one looks much better than your other entry.

=====
From awesomeamazingaaron@yahoo.com:

trees look a little questionable... But I liked the overall effect.
=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
with  a certain required amount of skill it is pretty hard to go wrong with
terragen and forrester im just not that crazy about the restrictions on their
terms of use for their noncommercial versions.

=====
From jschmi@optonline.net:
The water is beautiful!
=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
I think your this scene is very successful.  It has a subtle grandeur that 
comes from the simple way the elements of landscape, water, and sky combine 
to create the illusion of vast space.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Has a nice atmosphere but the lack of antialiasing and the visible rectangular
structures in the clouds are quite distracting.  The breaking waves do not
look very realistic.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Fairly pretty, but no story.  The Sun works well.  The land 
is too blurry.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The sun looks excellent, but the clouds look grainy in 
some places.  One thing I think would improve the scene 
would be to add vegetation to the islands.