=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
This image confused me when I first looked at it, because I couldn't see what
that grid thing was meant to be. I eventually realised it was a camouflage net
(which I guess means it was quite effective!).

It's really good image, and has a nice artificial air brushed feel, like it's
not a photo but a painting.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Hmmm, interesting... but there are too many things going on here for me to
discern any "moment"





=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

I like how the tones tend to match all around in this image.  However, one thing
that is very lackin in this work is proper shadows.  I think other viewers
would also find it harder to look at this image as a 'frozen moment'.  It looks
as though there is too much action going on.
=====
From N6re@mminternet.com:
What! No smoke?  Very busy scene indeed!

=====
From jonathan@scudder.no:
Nice use of colour. The "crap" you refer to in you text file is essential for
judges to be able to understand how much technical effort is put into the
image, and whether (and how much) of it is your work. Also a great learning
element, so don't knock it ;-)

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:

Quite a convoncing composition.
But I think you mixed aircraft from WW I with others from WW II.
The water tower (or whatever) looks a bit too shiny.
I always read the text carefully to aid in voting. Thanks for taking the time to
write it!
=====
From david.madore@ens.fr:
Nice title, and fairly striking image.



=====
From clem@dhol.org:
I like the dynamic feel and the coppery tone of the image.  
I think that the title and the obtrusive signature draw 
attention away from the image proper and damage the 
overall impression.  The image is nicely composed aside 
from that and the modelling is quite good.  Strange mix of 
tech levels in this war....  The surprising survival of the 
water tower in this hot battle is a striking detail.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
Nice composition and choice of colours.  The explosion 
effects look very good.  Some variations/imperfections 
in the helix wire would make it look more realistic.

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
Having the title 'in' the picture really detracts from an otherwise nice piece.
I especially like the sepia toning.