===== From rgow@lanset.com: I like this concept and the image. The shapes are simple, but combine well. The lighting looks a little strange to me, there are no shadows on the trees, and there are some circular artifacts on the left side and in front of the colored wall. ===== From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com: Nice twist on the topic, though more detail would've helped. ===== From raytracing@grayproductions.net: Well thought out. ===== From tek@evilsuperbrain.com: It's a nice concept but the modelling seems too simple. i.e. there's no small details in the scene and everything's perfectly flat. Also the lighting is very dark, and there's a few artefacts that look like errors in the radiosity. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: The rendered image has a nice feel to it. - the lighting works well. A couple of things may have made it better. The trees are growing out the structures, these could have been gowing out of holes in the structure. More detail on the structures would have added realism. ===== From hildurka@simnet.is: The concept behind this scene is clear and well defined. You bring every single architectural element to the scene. The diffuse lighting gives extra neutrality to the scene to underline that you are not working on any particular project but on the very concept of architecture. Good work! ===== From fergie_2002_@msn.com: i must admit i never understood until i read the text file which was enlightening but thats wat theyre there for ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Nice idea, the color-grey contrast is well implemented. Some more work on the details of columns and other parts would have been good IMO.