=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good concept and good implementation. Good lighting. Texturing could be better.




=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
I'm lost for words...

The sense of scale in this scene is truly awesome. The earth looks great. In
fact the only things I'd criticise are the rocket and the sun because they
don't look as believable as the rest of the scene.


=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The image is creative.   I like that.  The earth looks good - what about a few
clouds?  
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Good idea! Futuristic architecture. I like the idea of building on the outer
ring, using rotation to simulate gravity. This scene works, the earth looks
very good and the sun in the distance also looks fairly realistic. I like it!

=====
From dajs100@york.ac.uk:
The sun and ship detract from this image quite a bit, and the whole Earth is
really sunny. Fairy minor quibbles though; this is one of my favourites!

=====
From jjaguar@worldnet.att.net:
Good concept, one of my favourites this round.  One 
thing I noticed however is the lack of clouds on Earth.  
Also, the spaceship does not seem to have the same 
level of detail as the rest of the objects in the scene.  
Good job, though!

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Nice approach to the topic.  The earth could use some clouds of course.

=====
From ralf@treuherz.de:
The Earth needs clouds and some of the details of the space station looks weird
Good choice of camera angle. 

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The atmospheric effect on the Earth looks good, but the 
Earth itself looks too clear (lack of cloud cover, features 
too sharp).  The clustering effect for the starfield is a 
nice touch.


=====
From r@215-241.opf.slu.cz:
Nice work. But more technics as architecture. Architecture details are not so
good drawn. 


=====
From file:
Very nicely done. I really like the shell, but it seems a little cramped.
Notable for modelling