=====
From helene.dumur@free.fr:
Perhaps this is Trantor ? No ?

=====
From ph.gibone@wanadoo.fr:
Interesting idea, but not really about surrealism

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Kewl! I like your random seed! Not entirely sure it's surreal though.





=====
From szabocom@zappmobile.ro:
100% povray code. Well... If you could see your code, that would be 20 points of
technical merit. Without source it's only 19. The finished image looks greate.
I think this is one of my favorites.
=====
From pandatank@btopenworld.com:


just beautiful ;o)





=====
From davidfama@supereva.it:
A really grear image and concept...i hope you have provided the src code!!!
=====
From douge@nls.net:
Interesting image.  High marks for technical merit.  Well done.

=====
From noe.falzon@tiscali.fr:
It is very well done ! Great image for this topic !
=====
From pmccombs@xmission.com:
Most excellent

=====
From kingofmycastle@gmx.net:
Great. I like it. Hope to see the source.
I also thought about making such random
pictures.
Would also be a nice desktop. :-)

=====
From kevinq2000@yahoo.com:
More what I'd call fantasy, and less Surrealist. 
Technically impressive.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
I_m not sure if this image was created solely for the purpose of this contest
and the current topic. But this is a great image, really good work! My favorite
as technical merit is concerned.


=====
From jrcsurvey@msn.com:
I get of sense of surrealism refracted through the sixties.  High marks =
for originality.

=====
From intertek@one.net:

It's a very dynamic and interesting image but it seems off topic. Did =
you make this image for this competition?


=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
This could use a little more work. The problem for me is 
that pictures with lots of tiny bits always invite closer 
inspection, and closer inspection shows a lot of 
intersections and the lack of any true detail. Beatiful if I 
don't look to closely, however.