=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
Artistically speaking, this is a nice image.  However, I fail to see how it
relates to the topic: "epic proportions."  The image would have scored much
higher conceptually if the topic were video games or legends.  The lighting is
not shabby at all, however.

=====
From tryan2@rochester.rr.com:
Quite an intellectual stretch to link this to the topic of Epic *proportions*.
=====
From brianblovett@mac.com:
I can't see a connection to the topic. A very nice image, however.
=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
How does this relate to the topic?



=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Nice image though somewhat grainy. The trees look great and the light is really
good. There seem to be some artifact in the light cone, probably has something
to do with the software. Good work. 
=====
From renebui@aol.com:
What about epic proportions ?

=====
From phenlikescheese@hotmail.com:
Nice lighting... very good effect.

=====
From 25ct@lineone.net:
Nice. Some rotation on the trees would make for a slightly different image. The
vegetation around the base of the two front trees should be better than it is,
and repeated with variation on the trees in the background. 


=====
From file:
Notable for modelling, lighting


=====
From file:
Notable for originality, textures, modelling, composition


=====
From file:
perfect
Notable for originality, lighting, textures, modelling, composition