===== From skipt1@aol.com: This image has a definite artistic quality about that makes it very appealing. Although not very complex it does have a lot to look at. My suggestion would be to try vary the terrain a little more. ===== From rgow@lanset.com: Good image, good composition. I like the way the objects draw the eye through the scene. Only nitpick is how there is no cactus or plantlife in the background, everything seems to stop 200 ft from camera. ===== From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu: Very good image you have there. Those plants in the front right look great. Good use of isosurfaces, well made plants, and good textures. Also, the mountains in the back are very well made. Good lighting, and no need to apologize for your English, it's quite good. Keep entering in the future. ===== From ericf@foothill.net: I like the image, I think the saguaro cacti look a bit too straight, real plants are rarely that perfect, and I think that a little change would have improved the image greatly. ===== From raytracing@grayproductions.net: Looks like you put some work into this and I appreciate that. ===== From darwallace@earthlink.net: The image is too clean. I was expecting layered dust textures and/or a turbulated beige ground fog. ===== From file: Notable for composition ===== From file: Not very original Notable for modelling