=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
Very nice rendering, but I don't quite buy your link to the topic with this one.
 So Paris is deserted, alright.  How does this convey that though?  The
lighting is superb.  I especially like the projector effect, and radiosity
always adds a lot.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Very cute image and unique interpretation of the topic. The image is far from
photorealistic and yet provokes a strong emotional response through
recognisable and somewhat believable characters.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Lots going on here, very high detail level, good execution.  While I understand
the relationship to topic when reading the textfile, it is not apparent looking
at the image.

=====
From ewaninthailand@yahoo.co.uk:
Wonderful image, I've rarely seen better. Don't get the connection to topic
theme though.

=====
From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu:
Linking this to desert seems a bit of a stretch, but the image itself looks
amazing.  Nice blur, great modeling, wonderful lighting, and the amount of
detail in the image really brings it to life.  Great work.
=====
From ericf@foothill.net:
The originality is good, taking the concept in a very different direction.  But
it was hard to understand what it was about without reading the notes.

=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
We don't get to see Paris as a desert here, though the picture is impressive.
=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
I'm really tiring of naked Poser figures.


=====
From file:
Notable for composition, modelling, lighting


=====
From file:
Topic!!! but original
Notable for originality