=====
From zekaric@yahoo.ca:
A bit confusing to look at and the description seems to be needed to add depth
to the image where the image should speak all that by itself.  
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Without a doubt this is the smallest image this round...
On the whole the image has potential but needs to be higher res and more
detailed.

=====
From ian_c_thornton@hotmail.com:
Original concept.  Image is too small so it's hard to see what's going on.  The
snow looks featureless.


=====
From skirsch@comcast.net:
I'd like to see it bigger.

=====
From limdaepl@gmx.de:
could have been rendered at a heigher resolution IMO. especially considering the
render time. almost impossible for me to make something out.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Hard to tell with this one - it is too small.  I sense there is quite of detail
there but hard to tell...
=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
Why is this picture so small ?

=====
From ingo@freio.de:
Hmmm, you mention "many, many smaller objects", but that shouldn't have resulted
in a small image, should it? It's hard to recognize any of the details. :(