===== From zekaric@yahoo.ca: Without reading the description I wouldn't have understood what I was seeing as it related to F&I. Looks like it would be ok as a wall paper on newer theatre wide screend. Nice image but maybe a bit of a stretch. ===== From tek@evilsuperbrain.com: Interesting idea but the image is pretty simple. ===== From iacopo.mochi@tele2.it: Nice idea. Maybe you could have emphasized more the ice and vapour phases. ===== From ian_c_thornton@hotmail.com: This image has really grown on me since the last time I viewed it. This could never be photographed in real life but it looks like a photo. Technically perfect IMHO. ===== From limdaepl@gmx.de: Nice interpretation! The contrast between solid and fluid could however be stronger (almost not recognizeable). I would also have loved to see the density following a constant gradient from left (maximum) to right (minimum, as is) without that gathering at the center of the image. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Yes, I got the concept. It is a creative approach to the topic, nicely rendered However, personally I would have liked to see actual fire and ice. ===== From s.day@uel.ac.uk: A nice looking and good quality render. ===== From jgrimbert@free.fr: Collisions does occur, and it should not. Moreover, the picture is wrong because water is a polar molecul which make, as liquid, a kind of snake pattern... ok, not realistic, but no fire either ! ===== From fcueto@rice.edu: Loved it. Very original.