=====
From agage@mines.edu:
The terrain, lighting, and camera angle are good, though the creatures in
general need a few adjustments.  First, the motion just after leaving the
first castle and before entering the second surges a bit, which betrays the
dynamics of flight.  Also, the creatures seem to be totally solid in texture,
as opposed to having different areas textured differently.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
Just improving the castle texture (instead of monochromatic grey) would take
this 
animation a long way.  The speed of the bat-things should be smoother.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Very good camera work.  Eerie settings.  Nice tie-in with the theme: one of
the few to actually show something being transported!
Heavy pixellation of the heightfield -- how about using one heightfield
for the distant landscape, and a second one for the closeup area?
Good animation of the creature's movement and wings.

=====
From nazrat@athabascau.ca:
Time to dust off those physics books.  Acceleration was uneven, jerky.  Flight
path was not connected to flap strength or rhythm.  Camera movement could have
been smoother.  Nice setting.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
The wing motion was excellent, more detail for the castle, a longer movie with
more of a story would have helped this animation.
=====
From hcousineau@usa.net:
I like the castle, and the concept.  Probably because I love castles, buy hey,
that is not the point.


=====
From r@dmsst59.d.resnet.pitt.edu:
Nice wing deformation but rather drab.


=====
From r@cust150.webbernet.net:
Nice as far as it goes but, as you say, sketchy.  The sky is very dramatic.  The
wing animation is well done.  Not much story, but at least a nod in that
direction.  Should sky castles really be so blocky?


=====
From r@w3inet-phx.sps.mot.com:
Nice scene!  One small problem -- the wing motion is too slow for such small
wings -- it isn't clear what the motion is accomplishing.  Still, it's not a
bad little clip.
Notable for originality, composition