=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Cute, but ... transportation?  Pretty thin connection.  And the colors are
nice, but the movement looked almost random.

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
Bizarre...

Anyway.  It could just be the way that the objects line up, but the castle
almost appears to 'bounce' as it jumps into the air.

It would have helped the continuity of motion if you didn't have to cut out 500
frames just to fit under the limit.  My animation this round was 1000 frames,
and it was only 1.8M -- and the air freight entry used the same MPEG encoder
(I think) and got 1800 frames under the limit!  I'd suggest trying to get
better compression from your software, so you don't have to sacrifice frames
like that.


=====
From dpartrid@lawson.appcomp.utas.edu.au:
This is really obscure.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
Nice idea.  You could use more work in the motion routines.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Well, it sure is colorful.  It's got that checkered floor, and everything.
I'm not sure what kind of "mobile home" concept you were trying to achieve.
It's rather abstract overall.  Yes, it sure is colorful.


=====
From r@dmsst59.d.resnet.pitt.edu:
One word - "Odd".


=====
From r@dial-up6.webbernet.net:
Seems to lack point.  The dismantling is a nice effect, but the animation as a
whole isn't saying anything.  The flying in circles part seems awkward.


=====
From r@pm1-21.spectranet.ca:
A little weak on the relation to the topic...