=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Very good work for a robot!

=====
From PovRayGuy@aol.com:

John. John. John.  I don't know what to say.
=====
From manorton@jps.net:
Come on now.

=====
From dlauer@optonline.net:
Sorry Rosie, but TC was right.  Perhaps if you learned to type with both hands,
you could write more complex code. ;^|

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

No concept behind the animation... but nice movement.
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
WHERE'S THE SOURCE?????????????????
=====
From ldnbruce@flash.net:
EXTREMELY LAME

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
LAME

=====
From eallen@highway1.com:
Lame. Very Lame. After second thought, it's OK.



=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Rusty like it because he likes *you*.  But calling it "lame" is a bit harsh, I
think.
Just simple.  Nice smooth movement, though, and a cute tie-in to your other
entry.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
The only animation in the contest that was *created* by a robot!


=====
From file:
TC: Lame  Boxer: Very Lame  Tork:Way Lame


=====
From file:
Sorry rosie, maybe next time. Rusty and his friends are right. Ask John Van
Sickle for a little help.