=====
From r@dial-up42.webbernet.net>:
I did a lot of criticizing this time.  I think that is because the overall very
high quality of images this round made little flaws stand out more clearly. 
Many of the images were a little impersonal, lacking in "story quality".  I
attribute that to the subject.  No Eiffel Tower?  No Taj Mahal?  Surprising. 
Many images needed something to establish scale and set off the subject. 
Overall, the quality gauge has been turned up another notch.


=====
From r@bowerbird.cc.uq.edu.au>:
All very nice images!


=====
From BF246BA09C97:
Many images are nearing perfection.  I can't help becoming more critical the
closer they get--some are sooooo close, just a nudge would put them over the
edge into greatness.  Excellent effort by all entrants.  Sorry for the poor
turnout this time, but it did make voting easier.