=====
From jknepley@nyx.net:
At last, an image that's less serious in tone

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

The rendering of the stones in the watter is quite nice... the flamingos
are nicely done, as well. The plane is novelly modelled, but the rendering
lacks depth.  There is also no visible propulsion mechanism. 
The applicability to the subject is a bit remote.



=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
Cute... is it a plane or a ballista?  It is missing the rope cords that
provide the spring for the arms, other than that, it is an excellent
model of a ballista.  The colors are a bit radical.  
=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Amusing :)  I like the "colour selector rainbow" effect of the beach toys.

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
I guess I missed the point.  Nice colors and good modeling on the ballista,
but I couldn't grasp the concept.

=====
From karl@pemail.net:
Completely Surreal

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
The image is a bit too abstract for us.
The 'ducks' are cute!

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I'm not sure what all the babble in the txt file is about, nor am I sure how
the
machine in you image might work or whether it should be viewed as a "great
achievement".

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
It's, umm ... very surreal.


=====
From r@dial-up11.webbernet.net>:
This is a bit ... conceptual.  The beach toys are well done, if perplexing.  The
ballista looks more like a Lego biplane.  The water looks solid.