=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

Nice rendering!!! However, I see nothing in this image which indicates
anything about trigonometric land surveys.... If I hadn't read the text,
I wouldn't know it had anything to do with engineering.


The colors on the floor are especially well done... this really
is a nice piece of work.

The only question I have is why the columns aren't rotated with respect
to the otherwise symmetry axis of the structure. 

Dan

=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
This is a wonderful render, however, I have a hard time relating it to 
the achievment that it is supposed to represent.  The image has little 
to tie it to the Indian/British historical "basis" for its conception. My
initial feeling is elephants instead of heads would have been a better
choice.  Where is the survey equipment or even a hint... also, the survey
towers could have been integrated into the design in some fashion.
=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Nice image, interesting concept.  Having once seen a TV show about the survey
that covered some of the ingeneious methods that first Lambton and then Everest
had to come up with to successfully complete the survey, I'm just a little
dissapointed that you didn't attempt a render of the survey itself underway. 
Overall, good work.

=====
From daves@wkpowerlink.com:
I'm not exactly sure HOW this commemorates the survey...
=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Pretty image, though a bit abstractly tied to the topic.  Excellent colors and
modeling.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
I guess I don't understand why a survey is an engineering
achievement, nor how this commemorates it.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A nice image but the connection to the subject 
is not evident without reading the explanation.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I'm not really sure what really is shown in this image. The heads of the
people that made the India survey?

=====
From c_et_d@club-internet.fr:
For me, one of the best image of this round

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
It's visually appealing, especially the scrollwork; but the connection
to Engineering is pretty thin. The canopy overhead needs something.
(maybe move the geodesic thingy upwards to become a chandelier?)


=====
From r@dial-up42.webbernet.net>:
For so concrete a theme, the attempted connection is too indirect.  A shame,
because the image looks really good.  The scrollwork in the foreground needs to
be a bit smoother.  The play of color on the ground is nice.  Some clever
coding.