=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

Nice rendering of the subject, but perhaps a bit more context 
(see, for example, tbhdisc.jpg) would help.


=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
The process undergone to produce the objects in this image deserve a high
technical score, the image itself is a fine render of those efforts.  It
misses the Great in Engineering Achievement and has little artsy about it.
=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Nice modelling.  The colours look a bit washed-out though.
=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Very interesting concept, although the composition could use some work.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
How about adding a pencil or something to show the scale of the
scene?   These heads could be 7mm or 70mm tall, I cannot tell.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Good representations but rather stark.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Wow, that looks really cool. But the twin-head is no longer that outstanding,
most mid-range tape decks have that these days. (usually recognized by the
label "3-head" (the erasing head is always seperate) on the case :)

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
The modelling of the tape heads is excellent, but the rest of the scene -needs-
something. Maybe a ribbon of tape snaking around between them, or some
stray screws and bits of wire...

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
I liked the choice of a subject that meant something to you personally.


=====
From r@dial-up42.webbernet.net>:
Decent job of csg. The wood background needs sharpening and a bit of turbulence.
 To make your point, you need to show some of the inner complexity that makes
the heads special.