=====
From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu:
I don't find the image that interesting to look at, except to note the patience that it must have taken to make the whole ship.  I am used to doing CSG in POV-Ray, and have not used sPatch yet, but I imagine that it is still difficult to keep track of how your wavy surfaces are fitting together.

=====
From sammy@cube.net:
I thought about giving you a 1 for Concept, just for using Titanic!
(argh ... *SHE* is again on the radio! Can't stand it anymore! No! 
No!Please, Spare me!)

Just joking ... It's a very good picture! I like the small 
pieces lying around and the look of bent metal of the hole!


=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
The light isn't really realistic. At that depth thee should be no sunlight,
so the ship should be illuminated by a lamp, and then the lighting wouldn't be
so "uniform", I think.
The modelling is very good though!
=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Impressive historical rendering! I would like to see more evidence of being on the sea floor; while rusted, the ship looks awfully clean.
=====
From jull43@ij.net:
Quite an interesting rendering but not history but today. 
The wreck is historical not history. As a technical point, 
two miles down, the only light comes from the camera 
lighting used thefore the lighting for the scene is wrong. 


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I wonder what those red stripes are meant to be? Is underwater rust really
that red?
Some of the cracks in the deck look really good.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very nice! It only seems to be missing a school of fishes...

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Lots of hard work, obviously.  But the result is still monochromatic and depressing.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Well done. Might have been better if there was more to 
suggest water.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Very nice almost-monochromatic feeling.  Is has a feel of 
quietness.  The
elements have thickness and depth, some mystery, and 
much weight too.
A very _solid_ image, indeed !

=====
From lowellr@globaldialog.com:
About lighting
  This would be a deep cold water picture. Light at this 
depth would be almost non existant. The water 
"texture?" would be murky. Shadows would be 
nonexistant. A more "real" approach would be to have 
the view from a minisub. The light provided by the subs 
search lights. 
Also if you mess around with the camera normals ie. a 
nice streched ripple normal will give a water current 
affect.
and by the way, where is the manditory bubble stream 
This of course is only my opinon and I have been known 
to be wrong ( once) Bob 

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Nice job.  Kind of spooky, I would not want to go inside.  
The buckled sheet metal plates came out well.  For 
improvement I would add the search light from the 
exploring sub.


=====
From r@pluto.icom-solutions.com:
Notable for originality