=====
From uwezi@geocities.com:
one of my favourites

=====
From scarmig@ohmss.com:
A good idea and good job on the bridge itself!  The hills look odd, though I'm
not sure why.  Maybe they should be covered in forest or if there aren't trees
in places, a texture that looks like high grass.  I seem to remember a lot of
both in San Francisco when I was there.

=====
From jake@snafu.de:
Good model and fog. The hills and trees work well too, but I find the lighting
needs some tweaking. At the moment the colors are too bright and 'cartoony'.

=====
From curtis_cooper@hotmail.com:
Paint way to bright.

=====
From tglover@nettally.com:
So this is why you wanted International Blaze Orange.

I thought the bridge was painted red.  Hmmmm.....

Very impressive modelling and attention to detail (only 94% full moon?)

Did you consider some sort of gradient blue on sky?  It seems a little too
blue near horizon -- a minor quibble.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
A very good sense of depth and very good use of fog.
The sky's colour could have been better with some gradient towards the horizon.
Good concept.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
I really like the aspect ratio of the image.
Ground fog is nicely non-uniform, but gets a little too bright in some areas. 
Slightly barren: not one single car, airplane, boat, building, or bird.  Good
work (as usual) in research, accuracy, attention to detail.  Nicely artistic,
too.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Add water and lose the fog and this image could be 
excellent.  I still hate this aspect ratio, but at least you 
used it with a horizontal theme.  That fog is a real image 
killer, in my opinion.  It doesn't make it look interesting or 
exotic or artistic.  It makes it look unfinished and possibly 
damaged.  A pity because the bridge is very good and the 
land is really excellent.