=====
From grimmg@hotmail.com:
hte ground is too flat, and there are no impact of asteroids. 
I like the way you did the aluminium on the vehicule (but not enough futurist
!)

=====
From uwezi@geocities.com:
the heightfield  is too visible in the foreground
great family picture !!!

=====
From scarmig@ohmss.com:
Good job all around!  The only complaint I have as the fractilization of the
landscape as it gets near the camera.  I would have liked to have seen the
puffs of dust from all the movement as well as foot prints and such.

=====
From curtis_cooper@hotmail.com:
Space seems very black, not a single star.

=====
From tglover@nettally.com:
Love the kid straying from the trail!

Moon surface great at distance, but tessilates in the foreground.  Good
texture on it, tho.  Foil is pretty good, but needs smaller crinkles - try
scaling by about 1/10 .

Good lighting, but maybe crop left 1/4 of pic - more interesting?

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Very good interpretation of the topic.
The moon's surface could be nicer though.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Clever idea, and well-done modelling on everything except the lunar surface. 
Its triangular pattern in the foreground is distracting.  The gold foil on the
lander is quite good.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Terrible polygonal artifacts on the ground.  Lander texture 
does need work.  Good layout.  Needs footprints.