=====
From cdsi26@bupers.navy.mil:
This is not a bad piece of work.  I feel that a small amount of light outside could have helped.  Good first effort.  Get ready for the next round.

=====
From daffyduckx@hotmail.com:
The dim but still slightly visible background was a good choice. And those
are some great pumpkin faces.


=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Needs some unique twist to make it horrific.
=====
From timk@jtse.com:
Cool expressions on the pumpkins' faces.

But the scene, overall, is very weak. The setting is unclear. The concept is a
cliche at best. The contrast is relatively poor.

=====
From dwallace@lynx.dac.neu.edu:
This one could have been done better.  The lack of texture detail killed it.

=====
From tina@ripco.com:
Cute carvings.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good job for a first rendering!  I know it's supposed to be dark outside, but a dim light source outside the jack-o-lanterns would add a lot of depth to the image by adding more shadows.  It would also be good if the candles inside the pumpkins would cast shadows on the ground nearby.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
Nice first image Chris.  The walls are really flat, they look like brick patterned wallpaper.  Can't see the floor, it's not light enough.  I'd suggest that you take a look at the code that other people have posted along with their images for this competition, you will no doubt pick up some useful tips, I know I do.


=====
From file:
Pathetic.  There is no other word for it.