=====
From cdsi26@bupers.navy.mil:
A little less gloss on the face would get rid of the plastic look.  You could have reflected and image map of what she is being forced to watch on here eyes.  Good concept and frightening idea.

=====
From daffyduckx@hotmail.com:
The skin texture is a little to shiny, like plastic. But a horrific scene
none the less.


=====
From timk@jtse.com:
Excellent concept. Gut-wrenching. Great use of a simple model and non-realistic
texture. Excellent contrast. I can't look at it for more than 20 seconds without
beginning to go insane.

Except, there are some odd shading problems on either side of the nose. It
looks like something wrong with the normal vectors. Did you intend to have that
there? It's distracting.

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
I love this image.  American primitive meets Otto Dix.

=====
From tina@ripco.com:
The concept is good. The face is very doll-like and the eyes a bit oddly 
executed.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
OUCH!  OOOOOUUUCH! Definitely macabre.  Great concept, but such an extreme closeup exposes all the tiny flaws: lack of tears/reflections in the eyeballs, skin pores, eyebrow hairs, etc.  The scariest single element in the image is the hooks -- I wish they were slightly more prominent.  Perhaps if they were a brighter texture than the chain/eyelashes, they would be more visible.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
It looks so plastic I'm not even going to read the text file.