=====
From cdsi26@bupers.navy.mil:
Nice camera tilt.  Thought it was a chinese dragon.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice work but everything looked to metalic, even the eyes and teeth looked metal.


=====
From timk@jtse.com:
Looks like a statue.

Good, penetrating eyes and facial expression.

Good use of camera bank. Makes it feel like I'm flying.

=====
From ameede@madmac.com:
Very powerful composition, the demon or gargoyle projects dramatically at the viewer.  It would have been more realistic for me had there been more texture added to the demon. I am probably stating things that are quite obvious to anyone, but this is what makes the image lacking in some respects.  It would have been nice to add something that makes me say I never thought about it that way before.

ameede@madmac.com

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
It's an attractive, luscious image, but not really horrible

=====
From dlauer@optonline.net:
Good Image

=====
From dwallace@lynx.dac.neu.edu:
The critter detail is insufficient for use in the foreground.  Put a few of them circling the castle and the image would work much better.

=====
From tina@ripco.com:
The teeth look very plastic. Actually, the entire demon looks very plastic.
This cuts down on the horror aspect. Too many red things in the scene.

=====
From ericf@foothill.net:
Nicely executed images, though a certain feeling of cartoonishness exists.  For some reason though, it's such a good cartoon, I can't really complain about it, it looks too interesting.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Same comments as your other image: sharp vivid focus, and zero interaction or relationship between the main character and the background.  Textures need some work here: everything from teeth, eyeballs, to skin, has the same shininess.  The eyes, particularly, should be more glossy and slightly reflective.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
Nice monster, needs textures.