=====
From ekaiser@camden.tds.net:
nice. Would be way better with radiosity

=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Nice lighting effect

=====
From ddombrow@vt.edu:
Some softer shadows and a little bit more ambient light might help here. Still, nice image.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice work!  the textures needed a bit more work.... but the atmosphere and everything else... great.
=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
I agree with you, using such a powerfull tool is just too easy, but when used
well, as you did, not only is it smashing, but I think it can be viewed as
appropriate. The position of your man is very successful.
I don't like the so straigh line of the broken ceiling though.

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
Nice Poser modelling. Having never tried it, I just have to believe
when you say it's easy. And when so, I must wonder, why you left
the other scene so simple? One Poser model doesn't carry this one
to the top ranks, but I feel that there would be potential in using 
that figure in a major role as a part of a more detailed scene.

Btw., where did you find that hideous pastel cyan/green you're using
in the pillars? ;-)

=====
From chris_darcy@yahoo.com:
Poser. Mmmm! Tricky.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This is a nice picture... I like the light coming in from 
above to illuminate the center of the scene.  Other than 
the figure, though, there doesn't seem to be much 
complexity to the scene.  (not that a simplistic scene 
can't be good... just given the subject matter I think it 
would work better if it had more detail.)

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very nice ambient. Good feeling of the topic. Excelent composition. Only needs some more
imperfections, perhaps. Good Poser job (easy? for you, of course).

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
One of the few scenes this round where a Poser person 
improves the image.  In most others, the person is just 
thrown in, but here it is needed to tell the story.  The 
darkness and poor detail on the back wall hurt this image, 
as does the excessive fog.  What little detail the back wall 
does have is only visible with considerable fiddling.  Lose 
the fog, add detail and interesting artifacts and improve 
the lighting (maybe give the archaeologist a nice bright 
torch or flashlight?) and this image would be far better.  A 
promising start, but it needs some tweaking.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
A good image, some nice texturing.  The only thing that this is really missing
is an object of interest for that human to look at, he appears to just be looking
at stones and bricks.  Great atmospheric feel to this work.  The textures could
have all been done in POV or MegaPOV, no need for psp.


=====
From file:
Notable for lighting, composition, textures