=====
From ekaiser@camden.tds.net:
cool. The textures and atmosphere need some tweeking. This would be awesome with
some radiosity

=====
From chris@bluelectrode.com:
Cool, great interpretation.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
I liked your use of color and light..footprints in the sand... although the sand
wasn't too realistic.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
I like the idea of a script you work to.

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
Impressive modeling on the astronauts in the foreground! I wish you
had given the buildings the same effort, as they pale in contrast to
the human figures. Not that they'd be bad, but the level of detail 
simply isn't the same. I'd also give the ground a bit more effort, 
especially in the foreground. That clean linear striping isn't too 
believable, as other elements in the image indicate that surface wind 
does exist.

Extra artistic points come from well-designed and executed details:
the barely visible twin moons, the piles of sand collected against
the buildings' walls etc. Good work, Patrick!

=====
From jd@surveyor.in-berlin.de:
Some of the Aliens are really funny.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Good use of color and shadows, and the figures look 
good.  I also like the amount of detail in the city.  To 
me, though, there's nothing in the scene itself that 
implies the city is deserted or abandoned, so I don't feel 
it fit the topic very well.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
The structures are well modelled, but the "explorers" are 
too cartoony and could be omitted without loss.  
Marginally on topic.  The color scheme is quite 
monochrome, but effective.  The moons in the sky could 
be a bit more visible.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
This is a spaceman image.