===== From bfranke2@home.com: Definitely could be the wilderness. For 7 AM, I would expect to see longer and stronger shadows. Also there is no tree line. The trees should stop at a certain altitude, followed by an area with little or no vegetation and then snow to the top of the mountains. ===== From Stickgod01@aol.com: Wait a second! There isn't grass on the top of snow covered mountains! Um... yeah. The clouds are good and trees are pretty good, but the grass thing is makin me mad. Sorry. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Wow! That's great! I love the fact I can't tell it is 3DS (this is good, very good!). The only thing wrong I can find if the green color, but that's a general problem on all computer images: green doesn't looks natural, they usually look too "standard". Anyhow, superb pic with a "precious" atmosphere. ===== From tony@j4tb.com: One of the better images this round. Your picture almost conveys to me a beatuiful spring morning. To really hit it on the head give it an auburn sky with the sun peaking over the mountains. (Ahh relaxing just to think about it.) Your technique for making the trees is very creative (Unfortunately I am a Povray User.) The mist near the top really touches the image off. ===== From bonsalva@bellsouth.net: The bottom half of the picture is great, a masterpiece all by itself. The mountains take away from the picture. Less detail and more mist as far as the mountains would help a lot. Good picture! ===== From javaearl@hotmail.com: Wow. It looks like one of those great paintings you see in museums. Good job. ===== From luisvaloyes@malditasea.zzn.com: I really like the fog effect ===== From mark.wagner17@gte.net: If 3D Studio Max has a slope-dependant procedural texture, I recommend you figure out how to use it. The positioning of the snow in this image is very unrealistic. Additionally, I had a hard time viewing the entire image. My monitor will only go up to 1024x768, and my video card will only go up to 1280x1024. ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Good lighting, nice water, IMO the clods should not be in front of the mountains ===== From jouni@mikrobitti.fi: Definitely unrealistic, definitely desktop backgroundic :-) ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: Very panoramic and pretty. The trees work very well, and the water and the mist look nice. I don't really care for the coloring on the mountains, though. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: An epic viewpoint. Nice forest and water. But the mountains are unnatural: if these are tall mountains, they should have a more distinct line where the green vegetation ends and the bare rock begins. ===== From peter@table76.demon.co.uk: Beautiful. ===== From albiaprime@aol.com: Artistic - Picture postcard perfect (well almost) Technical - The distant mountains would have looked more realistic if you had chosen a more bluish/purple for the foliage on them. Distant mountains rarely appear green. The very tops of the peaks would have been better in a stone texture. Mountains that rugged looking don't usually have much vegetation up that high Concept - Great intrepretation of the theme ===== From file: Sorry if I'm nitpicking, but this picture would have been improved if the vegitation didn't go so far up the mountains. Notable for composition ===== From file: Sorry if I'm nitpicking, but this picture would have been improved if the vegitation didn't go so far up the mountains. Notable for composition