===== From bfranke2@home.com: The asteroid field is pretty good, but that space ship kind of looks like a paper airplane. And what the heck are the two guys in the left front doing? ===== From tony@j4tb.com: Nice storm troopers except the closest one looks like he has 4 arms. The asteroid belt looks nice as well. A little bit of a streach on the topic but the image has a humorous aspect which I like. ===== From javaearl@hotmail.com: Great storm-troopers. Also, good asteroid field. ===== From warp@iki.fi: The idea is good, but perhaps a little bit far from the core topic in my opinion. The main theme of the image is not wilderness but what has happened to those poor guys. ===== From dmacisaacj@hotmail.com: Loved it. Huge Star Wars fan that was sweet... ===== From mark.wagner17@gte.net: Nice parody of "The Raft of the Medusa"! ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Very impressive use of isosurfaces for the stones, interesting interpretation ===== From jouni@mikrobitti.fi: A group of well-placed objects, but the texturing could use some more attention. ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: The asteroids look very good, as do the atmospheric effects. The figures seem too simplistic in comparison to the elements around them, though. I also get the feeling that the topic of wilderness came second to the idea of doing a typical space scene. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Excellent posing, lighting, asteroid, and drama. But "wilderness"? Not. ===== From peter@table76.demon.co.uk: Good use of the stormtrooper costumes (Gericault had more people in his picture, but he didn't have to worry about computer memory!). ===== From albiaprime@aol.com: Artistic - The asteroid field looks great. Technical - There seems to be some problem with the position of the body parts of the 2 stormtroopers in the foreground. They seem to have been the victims of some horrible transporter accident. Concept - Can't picture a wilderness here. Perhaps with no people and some alien plants on the main asteroid it might have been better.