=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Your scene is one I would like to get my hands on and 'walk' through just to see
all the detail you put in it. My only complaint is the lava doesn't seem to
have the steamy glow one would expect to see. Try using a little media on the
lava and I be that would look awsome!

=====
From elvish_archer@mailcity.com:
why always no life in there?

=====
From Stickgod01@aol.com:
A bit too much ambient light, but overall, good work.

=====
From stephenhasmail@yahoo.com:
Great work.  It sounds like you spent months on this work (in two months... how
did you do that?).  Anyway, gave ya a 20/20 for Technical merit.  Looks like
you deserve it.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The brightness, etc. look fine on my monitor this time 
around. Nice attention to detail in this scene.  Good 
concept, and a very nice job overall.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Good and hard work! Very good lighting, and nice composition. Perhaps I find
the
lava too red, while I expect it more orange. I find a similar problem with
rocks,
wich are perhaps too gray. Anyhow, great pic!

=====
From dooby@breathemail.net:
Loads of detailed items. I like it!

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
You two keep getting better and better! This is full of good details and some
nice modelling. Thanks for adjusting the brightness - this is much better :-)
Lots of little details add up to a well-structured image, and with an original
take on the topic as well. I think the biggest improvemet would be to add some
detail to the TV monitors - they look a bit boxy at the moment.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who gets a long way into a scene
before deciding where to put the camera; but yours worked out much better.


=====
From file:
Notable for modelling