=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
If u say so.

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
Rich use of the deep grays and very convincing textures.  Nice effect overall

=====
From steve@neurotrain.com:
A 16 T 16 C 18
Unfortunately the butterfly detracts from the scene. The 
wings are too long and narrow for me to perceive it as 
real (meaning it might actually be a perfect copy of a real 
butterfly, but it does not fit the mold of a generic buttefly)
Also it appears you only used one light source.  I think 
having another to the left of the flower, very dim, just to 
bring out the details pf the water/oil on that side would 
have helped.
Technically ...
The texturing of the flower is very good.  The butterfly 
looks stretched...
I like your interpretation of the concept

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This has an interesting feel to it.  I don't know that the 
concept comes across in the scene very well (I didn't 
realize it was metal until I read the text file.)  Nice 
butterfly.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Sorry, it doesn't look like a deliberately metallic construction, it just
looks more like a not-so-careful modeling of a natural flower.  Features
like screws, bolts, welded seams would help.  Butterfly is ok, though.

=====
From hfventer@ing.sun.ac.za:
Great light effects.
If the edges of the flowers were better worked off, that 
would have been great

=====
From fabien.mosen@skynet.be:
Good idea, I like the way the butterfly is differencied 
from the flower.  Some improvements
could be a flower with a more "mechanical" aspect, a 3d 
butterfly, and a crispier lightning.