=====
From BigTrav2001@chartermi.net:
Textures could use some work. Ants look a little too glossy, and the blanket
looks too rough, like it's not cloth. I really like the idea here though, and
the ants are modelled well.

=====
From babouche13@YAHOO.fr:

une bonne idee
=====
From pixel_guy@hotmail.com:
nice ant skin material!  imo, a little too much specular shine tho

very good job

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The ants and the grass look good here.  The shaping on 
the foil looks good, but the individual triangles stand out 
too much.

=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:

Nice perspective and the textures seemed credible.I think the background needed
a bit of work.... more detail or something..... perhaps depth of field would
have been a nice touch.
=====
From marcelocarvajal@ieee.org:
You need to work harder in modeling. Your ant texture is OK. The tablecloth
could have been more realistic. No comments about the pie and the grass.




=====
From lrwii@janics.com:
Nice perspective. I didn't know what the aluminium was 
until I read your TXT file.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Good composition.  

This is a generic note about realism:
Realism is nice, but why is realism significant artistically?  Is there any
other way(s) to represent more accurately, or more beautifully, which are not
realistic methods?

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
Very detailed limbs.