===== From jaime@ignorancia.org: Very very nice, but the perspective seems to hard. Anyhow, great cathedral ambient! ===== From thomas_gaukel@t-online.de: Quite good, but how was it created. I get the feeling, the floor ist tilting, was that on purpose ? ===== From dooby@breathemail.net: What renderer was used? Why is the topic Insects? ===== From bonsalva@bellsouth.net: Great picture. The size takes away from seeing the whole scene. Somewhere in there is reason why this is a fantasy, but I can't find it. ===== From elias@users.sourceforge.net: This looks good, the architecture deserves some additional technical merit. Something seems to be wrong with the description though, I can see none. As there is nothing really involving "Fantasy and Mystics", it's hard to put this on-topic. Many real churches seem likely to look just like that. Well, you still get some interpretion points for creating a mystical look. This is the first time a floating sword would actually have drastically increased my points in the last category.. hopefully I didn't just overlook the fantasy part - but that's the risk when not having a description.. now I really hope I didn't overlook that.. To me it says: JPGFILE: cattedra.jpg, then it says nothing more and shows the voting form.. I might check the ftp dir in case I can make all the 105 votes in time.. ===== From fmurr@free.fr: It would be nice of you to tell the tools you ===== From zebu@pingou.linux-site.net: topic:Insect??? What renderer did you use? Hard to judge a pic w/o knowing that... besides, you're twice off-topic (not insect and not Fantasy...) ===== From ruy@hipernet.com.br: Nice Cathedral. Quite off-topic, though... ===== From jesseh@softhome.net: Extremely cool looking cathedral, this one. Very eerie and atmospheric, great feel to the pic. ===== From delfeld@mailcity.com: I am not sure how this relates to the theme, unless the idea of mysticism is taken as "communion with spirits". Even still, excellent use of light and dark areas, as well as the bold divisions of areas. ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: The lighting effects work well here, and really make the scene for me. Not really sure how this relates to the topic, but since it wouldn't look out of place in a fantasy novel I gave you some benefit of the doubt. ===== From davidbridge@msn.com: This is a nice image; a great Norman vaulted ceiling. But with no information on how it was drawn it becomes impossible to judge. ===== From file: The ambient is almost phisical, the image is very detailed (note de frescoe painting on the right ceiling or the frontal stained-glass window). I can see it is very mistic but the description is bare. Notable for lighting ===== From r@c506707-a.olmpi1.wa.home.com: wow... very nice