=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
A nice sky and a good architectural design. The image is a bit sterile, maybe
the humans should play a more visible part? The flat grass plane could use some
more details maybe?

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice image.  Although the tiling of the grass is a bit too obvious.
=====
From lrwii@joplin.com:
A good overall effect. Time gets us all in the end. I'd 
like to see what you could do with more time.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Nice idea, but a bit more work on the details would have been good,
the foreground looks very regular.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy1.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From r@proxy3.ntu.edu.sg:
Too unrealictic. Would be good if spend more time on the texture of each
objectc.


=====
From file:
I had to comment on this image if for no other reason than a co-worker of mine
(who is from Taipei) was sitting with me and knew what the building was from
the thumbnail!  So high marks are in order for accuracy!  Well done.
Notable for modelling