=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Nice lighting and starfield. 



=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Excellent lighting. Very nice contrast and composition. The starfield looks very
flat, but everything else is very nice. 



=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
A pity that the fade to a winter landscape didn't exactly work out... Now it is
more like a body than a landscape. Also, image doesn't seem to be "round
enough", even though the light works very well.

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
I really like this image, except I'm not too keen on the faceting apparent on
the model.

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
looks familiar' i think i've seen those peeks before

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
You should have more emphasized the landscape aspect.  Right now it is quite
near to being off-topic.  The meshing artefacts (probably strongly emphasized
by the slope pattern) are quite distracting too.  The idea itself is not bad
at all.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Body presented as landscape just squeaks in as topic.  
Sculpting the shape out of landscape materials would 
have been much better.  Stars are too phony looking.


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
Background needs work as well as the model seems way to low-poly