===== From rgow@lanset.com: Very surreal. Good use of composition & the mirrors to create the effect. Cutting it close on topic, though. ===== From leoszilard@yahoo.com: Had a hard time tying the image to the theme. I mean there are buildings, but I don't see them, or their design as the centerpiece. ===== From raytracing@grayproductions.net: This image is pleasing to the eye, but never really felt very architectural to me. ===== From tek@evilsuperbrain.com: I saw this on the newsgroups and didn't really get the point, but I can see it now! Very clever scene from a technical point of view. My biggest criticism would be that I get the feeling surrealism was used as an excuse to miss out a lot of details: e.g. the people aren't textured properly, the buildings and pavement are very simple. Whilst you could argue this is a stylistic thing I think the scene would be improved by adding more details, like the stack of paper, plus you get a higher score if it looks like more work had gone into it. But it's a very good concept. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: I liked the atmosphere you achieved. The problem was the elements didn't add up to telling a story per se - at least that I could tell from the image. The other problematic point was that the focus was not on the architecture. The paper and the body seemed to to be focal points. ===== From hildurka@simnet.is: Nice concept. I have been looking at this image for a while and I am still unsure of where the mirrors start and where they end. If it wasn_t for the text file I would be completely unaware of them. But in a way it helps, adding confusion sometimes helps to bring out the message. Nice work on the streetlights and the flying papers. The overall compostion is good and the theme of loneliness in the city is very good. ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Nice idea, i would probably have made the mirrors somewhat better visible through some slight normal. ===== From p_chan@shaw.ca: The mirror effect is nice, as is the stack of papers blowing in the wind.