===== From jon@vulpecula.us: The image is too dark to really tell how well it was made. Doesn't make much sense to me, either. ===== From rgow@lanset.com: It was the butler... Clever concept. Arm doesn't look too healthy. ===== From hildurka@simnet.is: I must admit I don_t understand the concept of this image. Why would anyone crushed under a bookcase want to reach for stones? Mysterious! ===== From pbrasolin@yahoo.it: Strange image, but surely original. PB ===== From info@michaelscholz.de: Strange... hmm... mysterious. ===== From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com: It is a bit hard to guess what is going on. I thought you were depicting a monster that is responsible for those missing toys a child always goes through. From reading your explanation, it seems some one is crushed under a book case, but the hand_s positioning does not seem to be indicating this well. ===== From p_chan@shaw.ca: The hand is modelled fairly well, but the fingers do look somewhat short and stubby. ===== From emediez@emediez.com: Overwhelming shadows. ===== From glenn@mccarters.net: I don't understand a few things about this image. What are "Stones"? A good variety of wood textures, but some of them (especially the back = wall) seem too big for their objects. The sign on the wall is extremely distracting - it makes no sense being = here in the scene. The rolltop desk is nice. ===== From file: that sucks