=====
From ph.gibone@wanadoo.fr:
The idea depicted in the description is very interesting, much there is too much
distortion (imho)

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Heh heh, I remember that scene from the book... great idea. The camera lens
effect is maybe too strong, it would be nice to make out some detail of the
house.
=====
From thatsalloneword@msn.com:

I love the concept, but I think it would've been much better without the
distortions (or at least, toned down a bit).
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
This would be great art but will probably be rated poorly here because the 3D
nature of the image does not come through (unless you visualize it).
=====
From kingofmycastle@gmx.net:
A really good idea to express surrealism.

=====
From kevinq2000@yahoo.com:
While "So Long And Thanks For All The Fish" is a
surreal book, I just don't think this is a very
Surreal image.  Abstract, yes, but that's not quite
enough.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
I like the concept, it is really strange. The distortion looks good, but it
obscures the true image so it is impossible to see this inside out effect. Too
bad. Makes this look like a painting.

=====
From p.gibellini@teinos.com:
Interesting and autoreferential ;-)

=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
This is quite a different take from the surrealism 
presented in the book, the schtick of which seemed to 
be showing the ridiculous as plainly and simply as 
possible. There isn't enough left after the distortion to 
recognize this as any house in particular.


=====
From file:
Notable for composition, originality


=====
From file:
This is surreal at its most blurry.