=====
From ph.gibone@wanadoo.fr:
Sorry, I don't get what's the point

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
I like the image, but more info in textfile would help with scoring.

=====
From szabocom@zappmobile.ro:
You made a renderer. That's the biggest technical merit. :) Good work!
=====
From pandatank@btopenworld.com:
lovely warm colours and clarity ;o)







=====
From pmccombs@xmission.com:
I really like this picture, but it is more abstract than surreal.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice looking image.  Simple but profound.
=====
From kingofmycastle@gmx.net:
Looks very realistic.

=====
From kevinq2000@yahoo.com:
I don't get what this is.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Nice image, but I don_t se the relation to the Topic. 


=====
From jrcsurvey@msn.com:
Lovely image.  Again the surrealist interest in tactility but also a =
sense of the absurd.

=====
From woodhead@mtrose.net:
Minimal comment: Not so sureal, but I want it on my wall.

=====
From intertek@one.net:

Beautiful. Off topic.


=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Wow. An entry produced by your own renderer. This is 
an incredible accomplishment. The image itself is, to the 
best of my ability to ascertain, completely without 
signifigance.


=====
From file:
The picture is quite realistic. As real as you can get for surreal. Perhaps a
little bit boring, but it's not bad at all.