=====
From exether@demo.xandmail.com:
Even knowing Lovecraft, decay is not so obvious.
Nice abstract image though.

=====
From god@rajram.com:

its ok, could show DECAY a bit more.
=====
From sigmanufratguy@netscape.net:
I think you really stretching it to link this image with decay.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Interesting image. Borderline on the topic.

=====
From panikme@yahoo.com.br:
I'm like the image, but I think this image can be make with other color to a
more imprecive efect.
sorry for my terrible english
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Looks too abstract for my taste. Also, if I have to read 
the text or even a book, to get the image... I don_t know. 
Nice philoshopy though. 

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

An amusing image, but hard for a viewer to understand if they have not read your
explanation.

=====
From Knight-Graphics@earthlink.net:
Interesting_ but I have seen so many like it. Continue to push the limits of
your imagination (and your computer).
=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Trying to judge an image like this points out to me some
of the problems with judging art. I've read Lovecraft and
yet I don't see "decay" in this image.


=====
From file:
hfghfgdfgdfg


=====
From file:
hfghfgdfgdfg


=====
From file:
Impressive in its interpretation and implementation. I like the idea of a simple
scene creating the chaos - it fits what you wanted to reveal. As far as general
decay-ing-ness, not so much. Great image, a leap to reach the theme.
Notable for composition


=====
From file:
Notable for composition


=====
From file:
Notable for composition