=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
The surroundings could use more detail, maybe some small rocks lying about and
roughness on the bulk of the stone.  The stream (magma?) doesn't appear very
real because it is very bright, yet does not emit any light at its
surroundings.  The exposed genitalia on Hades is more vulgar than artistic;
it's not, after all, a study of the physique of the lord of the underworld. 
Rather than submitting several sparsely detailed scenes, try to put all of your
effort into a single, richly detailed piece of art.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Try attending to the background details to the extent you focus on the figures. 
Nudity doesn't impress me.
=====
From jminner@sc.rr.com:
High marks for texture usage, and origanality, but low mark for the demon
penis...lol

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
I like your other entries better...  texturing & lighting in this one are weak,
the scene has no dynamics.





=====
From simplepsy@aol.com:
Good interpretation of the story. However I was a little taken aback by the
umm... explicit nature. I cant give merit to the modeling, since most of this
is done in poser. ... fair is fair...I use poser too.  Scale is a little
wonkey, the man in front apears far smaller than the woman in the cage... and
thats not accounting for perspective! 

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

The modeling looks good.  The texturing however could do with some more work.

=====
From file:
If we took away the poser models what's left? The lava and floor are too smooth.
The cage and the harp are ok.