=====
From tom@ringard.org:
I don't like the face of your Edison but it's a good idea and an interesting
technical challenge. One of the best image, for me.



=====
From rich@brickbots.com:
Nice lighting, good depth of field.  I like the B&W and 
the care you have taken on some of the textures.  
Notably the smudge on the wall upper-forground-left.  
The inanimate objects look great.  Humans are tough to 
model, just keep at it.  I look forward to seeing your next 
entry.

=====
From Knight-Graphics@earthlink.net:
Was he really that scary?
=====
From simplepsy@aol.com:
Artisticly I cant say much on this since you copied a photo. However technicly
this image is superb. 

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
A good job with a difficult scene. Inceasing the polygon count of the mesh would
help, there are still some visible corners on his face & hands.

=====
From uglycasanova420@hotmail.com:
Every thing except the character was awsome. The guy wasn't done as well as it
could have been.

=====
From terraform@upnaway.com:

I like this picture, but the use of all those lights has stripped out a lot of
depth in the shadow, have you thought about using increased ambient settings to
make things brighter.
Good looking image with good use of effects like focal blur.
=====
From corvus@onewhiteraven.com:
a terrific image, recognisably Edison, but his face is just a little too
lumpy...

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice image.  The human face needed more attention to detail but still a very
nice image and the texures and lighting were superb.

=====
From file:
Notable for modelling, textures, lighting


=====
From file:
very difficult work. nicely done. not an exact likeness but not many could. good
concept as well
Notable for modelling, lighting, composition, textures, originality