=====
From Knight-Graphics@earthlink.net:
Continue to push the limits of your imagination (and your computer).
=====
From tenmoons@aol.com:
I like the subject matter.  I think I'd try positioning the camera so that the
top of the heelstone is even with the horizon and possibly having the sun or
moon rising over it (though it might be difficult to light the scene that way).
 Think I'd like softer, fainter shadows, maybe from a big ol' area light, on
such a cloudy day. 
  "I've never been able to find precise measurments/description of how the
stones are laid out."  "Stonehenge Decoded" by Gerald S. Hawkins (think that's
the name), from the early '60's (check used bookstores)--many diagrams, much
info.



=====
From simplepsy@aol.com:
Good idea. but the preciseness of it is a bit suspect. Looks to geometrical and
simple... little effort. But a good concept. 

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Might have been good to have the stones a little more 'stonelike', as without
reading your description I had no idea what this was.

=====
From uglycasanova420@hotmail.com:
Shity piece of work.

=====
From terraform@upnaway.com:
Nice placement of the stones, though the problem is we all know what they look
like, some blobs for rocks would make this look better, well done nice scene
structure and camera placement

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Not sure how this links to invention.

=====
From file:
very basic conceptfor stone henge. okay but maybe in the future using some rough
cuts for the rocks????